'Lennon,' the Yoko Musical, Needs 'Help!'

Discussions related to John Lennon as Beatle and his solo career.

Moderator: Mike

'Lennon,' the Yoko Musical, Needs 'Help!'

Postby I am the Paulrus » Sat Jul 23, 2005 4:52 am

'Lennon,' the Yoko Musical, Needs 'Help!'

Thursday, July 21, 2005

By Roger Friedman

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,163171,00.html

"Lennon," the Broadway musical that's supposed to be about or inspired by John Lennon, is a horrid wreck of a thing that needs major overhauling before it opens Aug. 4.

Yesterday afternoon, I let curiosity get the better of me. On a whim, I called up May Pang, Lennon's girlfriend for a big chunk of the 1970s, and suggested we go take a look at what Yoko Ono and friends had whipped up for Broadway audiences.

This is not a review, since "Lennon" has not officially opened yet, and should not be quoted as such. These are just observations, from a Beatles fan and from a woman who knew John and Yoko better than most. We are very protective of the Beatles legacy, you know, those of us in our later years!

"Lennon," you should know, is a biographical musical that almost completely avoids the Beatles. There is no mention of the group, and scant reference to its other members.

A heavyset black actor plays Paul McCartney. Ringo Starr and George Harrison are mere blips in the script.

The show boasts not one actual Beatles song, with the exception of "The Ballad of John and Yoko," which was written and recorded by Lennon and McCartney together. (That point is not made, however, because McCartney is meritless in Yoko's universe.)

Otherwise, no "In My Life," "Come Together," "Help!," "A Day in the Life," "I Feel Fine," or any of the other Lennon standards from the Beatles catalog.

At one point the opening guitar chord from "A Hard Day's Night" is heard, and then dropped.

Indeed, from Lennon's solo repertoire, "Jealous Guy," "No. 9 Dream" and "Happy Xmas (War Is Over)" are noticeably absent as well.

That's because Ono, no matter how much you may think she's either a widow still in pain or a genius performance artist, has made "Lennon" all about her.

I've no doubt that Cynthia Lennon, John's first wife, and Julian Lennon, his eldest son, will skip the show entirely. Ditto McCartney, Starr and George's widow, Olivia Harrison.

They would all cringe as the show quickly dismisses the entire Beatles era so it can get to Lennon proclaiming his love and adoration for Yoko. She's his "Ono and only."

The whole experience was bizarre, made more so by the fact that May Pang was my companion for the afternoon.

After all, Pang went to work for the Lennons in 1970 and had a nearly two-year-long affair with John in 1973-74. She was there for the recording of his "Rock & Roll" and "Shaved Fish" albums. She lived with him in Los Angeles during his infamous year-and-half-long "Lost Weekend."

So imagine her reaction when "Lennon" just skips any reference to her. It's like being airbrushed out of a picture.

"I sent John to Los Angeles," Ono — played by talented, attractive Julie Danao-Salkin — declares at that point.

Pang almost did a spit-take at that point.

"No," she informed me, "I took John to Los Angeles."

Though the Lennons are reunited on stage during a romantic song, Pang points out: "Yoko summoned John home. She told him she could cure his smoking through hypnosis."

She rolled her eyes. "When I saw him again, it was as if he was a different person altogether."

Also not mentioned is that Pang — who tried to reunite Lennon with McCartney — continued to have a friendship with Lennon until a year before he died.

But that's the problem with "Lennon." Ono and pals have so rewritten or unwritten history that you have no idea who John Lennon was. You get no sense of his humor, of how he wrote songs or of his actual friendships with the other Beatles.

How could a man who helped compose dozens of catchy melodies with McCartney be rendered on stage as a cipher? Where is the magic of writing "Michelle" or the satisfaction of producing the "Sgt. Pepper" album? It's as if none of it happened.

Imagine, if you will, a McCartney musical that only focused on his participation in Wings.

Instead, "Lennon" throws in a lot of unimportant songs, mixes them with events to which they had no attachment and jumps back and forth in time until it's almost too confusing to figure out what the heck is going on.

Does an audience paying $100 a ticket really want to hear "Mother," "Mind Games," "Steppin' Out" and a torch-song rendition — performed off-key — of "Woman Is the Nigger of the World"?

I think not.

And we did not need a screechy — that's the only way to describe most of the female voices in this cast — rendering of "How Do You Sleep?"

The show does boast two unrecorded Lennon songs, "India India" and "I Don't Want to Lose You." The former is pretty; the latter is a bit pretentious and not Lennon's best work.

Neither one of them is presented very well, with "India India" used really to mock the Beatles' famous trip to that country. Another "lost" Lennon song, called "Cookin' (in the Kitchen of Love)," promised in press materials long ago, is not included.

"Lennon" has already been cited by my colleague Michael Riedel in the New York Post for being in trouble. But really, this is the kind of trouble the creative team could only have brought on itself.

The show reminded me of the god-awful TNT "Tribute to John Lennon" Ono produced four years ago. That was another show that omitted the Beatles and promoted the latter part of Lennon's career.

For the record, the Broadway show seems to still be in flux. Two songs — "New York City" and "Oh My Love" — were in the printed program, but didn't make the cut. The orchestrations, by the usually more level-headed Harold Wheeler, are almost all wrong for the songs.

Lennon must be turning in his grave. (So, too, must former Yippie Jerry Rubin, who really gets a raw deal by being portrayed as a buffoon.)

What can director Don Scardino do? Postpone the opening for two more weeks. No one really cares at this point.

Re-title the show "In My Life." Tell the story in proper chronology, not jumping all over the place. (There is much that should have been fact-checked.) Add "Across the Universe" and maybe a half-dozen Beatles songs (Michael Jackson needs the money, after all).

Try some laughs. Even putting in the rollicking blues number "Oh Yoko!" would do more to explain Lennon's interest in his mysterious wife than presenting her as a misunderstood martyr.

Lose the all-female rock band with big hair from the '80s, the ones who inexplicably shriek the Motown hits "Twist and Shout" and "Money."

Lose the multiple actors playing Lennon, keeping only the very talented Will Chase. Another "Lennon," Terrence Mann, who looks more like Boz Scaggs, could be recast as an older McCartney.

Ease up on the "I told you so" speeches by Yoko. Really. Otherwise call the show "Ono."

Finally, at least for now, I can't get over the irony of Clear Channel Entertainment producing a John Lennon musical. Clear Channel, destroyer of radio, masticator of the concert business, would have been Lennon's archenemy had he lived.

Clear Channel certainly has the money and power to have a place on Broadway. But you almost feel that this show, of all shows, is haunted by inappropriate corporate sponsorship. It's a little icky.
ImageImage
User avatar
I am the Paulrus
Silver member
Silver member
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 4:10 pm

Postby HeyJude » Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:34 pm

I read about plans of this musical one or two years ago, and I've never thought it would be a good idea... I mean maybe it works out well, but why do it in the first place? Doesn't seem like it's gonna work out. Ono strikes again?
one sweet dream came true today!!!!!
4.6.2004 Leipzig
yay Anna!!!! :mrgreen:
User avatar
HeyJude
Silver member
Silver member
 
Posts: 1560
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 9:14 am
Location: Hungary

Postby 2 of 3 » Sat Jul 23, 2005 4:17 pm

Oh no! :roll:
User avatar
2 of 3
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 2804
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2002 8:12 pm
Location: Canada

Postby Cologne girl » Sat Jul 23, 2005 7:19 pm

In light of this article, if really all of it (or even half of it) is true, Yoko's objections to Macca's reversal of some songwriting credits seem indeed rather ridiculous. I can't help thinking, like the author of the article wrote, that John would be turning in his grave; for all his love for Yoko, he couldn't possibly approve of this way of "unwriting" history. It's sad really.
It's the start of a journey
To a much better place
And this wasn't bad
So a much better place
Would have to be special...
User avatar
Cologne girl
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 8:16 pm
Location: Far Far Away

Postby Mini » Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:53 am

Whatever personal problems John and Paul had with each other I believe that John did love Paul as much as Paul loved John no matter what Yoko says or does to try to prove otherwise.

It seems she is on a mission to make John out to be better or above the Beatles which is weird given that he was one of them.
Mini
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Holland

Postby 2 of 3 » Sun Jul 24, 2005 12:00 pm

I believe that John did love Paul as much as Paul loved John



...which is probably why Yoko and Paul don't get along.
User avatar
2 of 3
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 2804
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2002 8:12 pm
Location: Canada

Postby Cologne girl » Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:01 pm

2 of 3 wrote:
I believe that John did love Paul as much as Paul loved John



...which is probably why Yoko and Paul don't get along.

I agree - in some weird way she seems to be jealous of their friendship, even these days.
It's the start of a journey
To a much better place
And this wasn't bad
So a much better place
Would have to be special...
User avatar
Cologne girl
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 8:16 pm
Location: Far Far Away


Return to JOHN

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron