Bluebird wrote:I think his attitude that time was too harsh and smart to me.HeyJude wrote:I LOVE that "Hark the angels come" part before Let It Be! John's jokes rule![]()
![]()
Hee
|
Moderator: Mike
Bluebird wrote:I think his attitude that time was too harsh and smart to me.HeyJude wrote:I LOVE that "Hark the angels come" part before Let It Be! John's jokes rule![]()
![]()


Bluebird wrote:There´s no one single song here who is better than Let it be naked version.

Bluebird wrote:There´s no one single song here who is better than Let it be naked version.

kylestyle wrote:Bluebird wrote:There´s no one single song here who is better than Let it be naked version.
I totally disagree. I love ALL the original Let It Be tracks far more than the Naked mixes. Take Let It Be itself, perfect ballsy Spector production, George's solo blazes the skyline. The Naked version - a sub-par George solo and some weird reverb sounds. I think they stuffed it up on the Naked version personally, and that goes for a lot of the Nsked reworkings. The only one I can bear regular listening is the "bare" version of Across The Universe, but without the orchestra, there's something magical missing. I'm so accustomed to the original versions, I will always love them infinitely more.

Naked is far superior and just SOUNDS more like the Beatles, WAD. Killer Philler and his gawd-awful arrangements have always made me want to hurl. Naked is what should have been long ago. It is as the Beatles intended. Thank goodness we now have it.kylestyle wrote:Bluebird wrote:There´s no one single song here who is better than Let it be naked version.
I totally disagree. I love ALL the original Let It Be tracks far more than the Naked mixes. Take Let It Be itself, perfect ballsy Spector production, George's solo blazes the skyline. The Naked version - a sub-par George solo and some weird reverb sounds. I think they stuffed it up on the Naked version personally, and that goes for a lot of the Nsked reworkings. The only one I can bear regular listening is the "bare" version of Across The Universe, but without the orchestra, there's something magical missing. I'm so accustomed to the original versions, I will always love them infinitely more.

Steve-o wrote:kylestyle wrote:Bluebird wrote:There´s no one single song here who is better than Let it be naked version.
Naked is far superior and just SOUNDS more like the Beatles, WAD. Killer Philler and his gawd-awful arrangements have always made me want to hurl. Naked is what should have been long ago. It is as the Beatles intended. Thank goodness we now have it.

Nice way to say it. It´s sounds much more of the beatles than the original. I don´t like the small comments who take place either.Steve-o wrote:Naked is far superior and just SOUNDS more like the Beatles, WAD. Killer Philler and his gawd-awful arrangements have always made me want to hurl. Naked is what should have been long ago. It is as the Beatles intended. Thank goodness we now have it.kylestyle wrote:Bluebird wrote:There´s no one single song here who is better than Let it be naked version.
I totally disagree. I love ALL the original Let It Be tracks far more than the Naked mixes. Take Let It Be itself, perfect ballsy Spector production, George's solo blazes the skyline. The Naked version - a sub-par George solo and some weird reverb sounds. I think they stuffed it up on the Naked version personally, and that goes for a lot of the Nsked reworkings. The only one I can bear regular listening is the "bare" version of Across The Universe, but without the orchestra, there's something magical missing. I'm so accustomed to the original versions, I will always love them infinitely more.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest