Pauls best work on a beatles album

by **kylestyle** » Sat May 08, 2004 7:21 am

Yeah it's funny how the media portrayed the Beatles and the Stones as bitter rivals and mirror opposites to eachother, yet they were actually friends with a mutual admiration for eachother.

by **Bluebird** » Sat May 08, 2004 7:28 am

yes that´s great. I don´t really think that their music was so closed, most in the first years in 60´s.

by **TheBeatles1988** » Sun May 16, 2004 5:40 am

Yes I have to agree! Sir Paul McCartney has produced some good work in his time. Hasn't he???

by **Bluebird** » Sun May 16, 2004 5:56 am

TheBeatles1988 wrote:Yes I have to agree! Sir Paul McCartney has produced some good work in his time. Hasn't he???

Of course he had.. When I hear a beatles album I fine it easeier to listen to Pauls songs than Johns. I just like Pauls work more than John.

by **Bluebird** » Sun May 16, 2004 5:56 am

TheBeatles1988 wrote:Yes I have to agree! Sir Paul McCartney has produced some good work in his time. Hasn't he???

Of course he had.. When I hear a beatles album I fine it easeier to listen to Pauls songs than Johns. I just like Pauls work more than John.

by **dsnito** » Mon May 17, 2004 12:50 pm

Both Paul and John can be considered as music geniuses each one in his style and talents...I just think that Paul has a better melody making ability than John...It´s a God´s gift to Paul, but I love John´s songs as much as of Paul...

by **Bluebird** » Mon May 17, 2004 1:52 pm

dsnito wrote:Both Paul and John can be considered as music geniuses each one in his style and talents...I just think that Paul has a better melody making ability than John...It´s a God´s gift to Paul, but I love John´s songs as much as of Paul...

They are both marvellous musicians and have made the songs of the last century and maybe this too... But You must admit that Paul is a better Music writer than John, right?

by **Cologne girl** » Mon May 17, 2004 6:58 pm

I rather agree with Nito; both were/are great in their own way. Your point of view, BPF, is rather subjective. I don't know what would have happened if John had used his abilities in the same way as Macca did his. John was perhaps a bit slower and a bit sloppier, but if he had had the same ambition, God knows what he could have done. Just listen to the John songs of "Double Fantasy" and tell me if he was not a darn good "music writer" if he cared to.

by **kylestyle** » Mon May 17, 2004 7:07 pm

Biggest Paul Fan wrote:But You must admit that Paul is a better Music writer than John, right?

I don't see it as a competition, John was John and Paul is Paul. Both people have their magical melodic moments.

by **HeyJude** » Tue May 18, 2004 4:14 pm

LOL, first came Gastro who claimed that John was the better one, now Greatest comes with "Paul's better". What if they were just both the best, not one better than the other? Why compare? :roll:

Pauls best work on a beatles album

Who is online