Pauls best work on a beatles album

Discussions related to Paul as a Beatle.

Moderator: Mike

Postby kylestyle » Sat May 08, 2004 7:21 am

Yeah it's funny how the media portrayed the Beatles and the Stones as bitter rivals and mirror opposites to eachother, yet they were actually friends with a mutual admiration for eachother.
I needed comfort of love just to get me some piece of mind.. wo-oh
User avatar
kylestyle
Gold member :)
Gold member :)
 
Posts: 2789
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 2:28 am
Location: New Zealand

Postby Bluebird » Sat May 08, 2004 7:28 am

yes that´s great. I don´t really think that their music was so closed, most in the first years in 60´s.
You must appreciate the day...
User avatar
Bluebird
Platinum member
Platinum member
 
Posts: 9023
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 10:06 am
Location: Copenhagen - Denmark

Postby TheBeatles1988 » Sun May 16, 2004 5:40 am

Yes I have to agree! Sir Paul McCartney has produced some good work in his time. Hasn't he???
Click here veiw my website

http://www.freewebs.com/thebeatles1988/
User avatar
TheBeatles1988
Silver member
Silver member
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 12:18 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Postby Bluebird » Sun May 16, 2004 5:56 am

TheBeatles1988 wrote:Yes I have to agree! Sir Paul McCartney has produced some good work in his time. Hasn't he???
Of course he had.. When I hear a beatles album I fine it easeier to listen to Pauls songs than Johns. I just like Pauls work more than John.
You must appreciate the day...
User avatar
Bluebird
Platinum member
Platinum member
 
Posts: 9023
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 10:06 am
Location: Copenhagen - Denmark

Postby Bluebird » Sun May 16, 2004 5:56 am

TheBeatles1988 wrote:Yes I have to agree! Sir Paul McCartney has produced some good work in his time. Hasn't he???
Of course he had.. When I hear a beatles album I fine it easeier to listen to Pauls songs than Johns. I just like Pauls work more than John.
You must appreciate the day...
User avatar
Bluebird
Platinum member
Platinum member
 
Posts: 9023
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 10:06 am
Location: Copenhagen - Denmark

Postby dsnito » Mon May 17, 2004 12:50 pm

Both Paul and John can be considered as music geniuses each one in his style and talents...I just think that Paul has a better melody making ability than John...It´s a God´s gift to Paul, but I love John´s songs as much as of Paul...
Life Is Very Short And There's No Time For Fussing And Fighting, My Friend...
Peace.
User avatar
dsnito
Platinum member
Platinum member
 
Posts: 5210
Joined: Mon May 13, 2002 11:58 am
Location: Brazil

Postby Bluebird » Mon May 17, 2004 1:52 pm

dsnito wrote:Both Paul and John can be considered as music geniuses each one in his style and talents...I just think that Paul has a better melody making ability than John...It´s a God´s gift to Paul, but I love John´s songs as much as of Paul...
They are both marvellous musicians and have made the songs of the last century and maybe this too... But You must admit that Paul is a better Music writer than John, right?
You must appreciate the day...
User avatar
Bluebird
Platinum member
Platinum member
 
Posts: 9023
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 10:06 am
Location: Copenhagen - Denmark

Postby Cologne girl » Mon May 17, 2004 6:58 pm

I rather agree with Nito; both were/are great in their own way. Your point of view, BPF, is rather subjective. I don't know what would have happened if John had used his abilities in the same way as Macca did his. John was perhaps a bit slower and a bit sloppier, but if he had had the same ambition, God knows what he could have done. Just listen to the John songs of "Double Fantasy" and tell me if he was not a darn good "music writer" if he cared to.
It's the start of a journey
To a much better place
And this wasn't bad
So a much better place
Would have to be special...
User avatar
Cologne girl
Supporter
Supporter
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 8:16 pm
Location: Far Far Away

Postby kylestyle » Mon May 17, 2004 7:07 pm

Biggest Paul Fan wrote:But You must admit that Paul is a better Music writer than John, right?


I don't see it as a competition, John was John and Paul is Paul. Both people have their magical melodic moments.
I needed comfort of love just to get me some piece of mind.. wo-oh
User avatar
kylestyle
Gold member :)
Gold member :)
 
Posts: 2789
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 2:28 am
Location: New Zealand

Postby HeyJude » Tue May 18, 2004 4:14 pm

LOL, first came Gastro who claimed that John was the better one, now Greatest comes with "Paul's better". What if they were just both the best, not one better than the other? Why compare? :roll:
one sweet dream came true today!!!!!
4.6.2004 Leipzig
yay Anna!!!! :mrgreen:
User avatar
HeyJude
Silver member
Silver member
 
Posts: 1560
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 9:14 am
Location: Hungary

PreviousNext

Return to Paul as a Beatle

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests