Had George got a career if he not was a beatle?

by **Bluebird** » Sun May 09, 2004 7:48 am

by **Maestri09** » Mon May 10, 2004 3:07 pm

George loved music. By far he was the best musician in The Beatles. I'd say he would have been a professional musician later in life. Not much of a "pop star" though.

by **Cologne girl** » Mon May 10, 2004 6:56 pm

Maestri09 wrote:George loved music. By far he was the best musician in The Beatles. I'd say he would have been a professional musician later in life. Not much of a "pop star" though.

I agree with you. I suppose he would have played in bands, but maybe he would not have got onto songwriting.

by **Bluebird** » Tue May 11, 2004 3:45 pm

Cologne girl wrote:
Maestri09 wrote:George loved music. By far he was the best musician in The Beatles. I'd say he would have been a professional musician later in life. Not much of a "pop star" though.

I agree with you. I suppose he would have played in bands, but maybe he would not have got onto songwriting.

Agree, I think he had been developed in Beatles from 1968-1970 to write for him self. He must had been a good guitarist in an rock´n roll band, maybe.

by **dsnito** » Tue May 11, 2004 5:55 pm

Yeah, I guess he would have a great carrer, WAD...but not with the same successful as a Beatle member, though he really was an awesome guitarrist.

by **Bluebird** » Thu May 13, 2004 8:07 am

Maybe he will get a career, but I think he couldn´t have wrote so nice songs if he hasn´t John and Paul to inspire and learn him.

Had George got a career if he not was a beatle?

Had George got a career if he not was a beatle?

Who is online