No ruffling here, gastro boy. It's all good and I enjoy tangling with you on these things. Paul's weakest album (Macca II) was still far better than the dreadful Mind Games or SINYC. And I quite like Paul's 80's output. Some really nice moments. The comment about John not making albums like POP, etc, was right on. He would not have made anything as good. [:D] See how silly both of those arguments sound?
You are obviously a huge Lennon fan and that clouds your vision. Kinda funny---but I've seen it many times before---his legend grows with each passing year. Are you sure you aren't Jann Wenner? LOL. There are Lennon fans and there are Macca fans. I know who was/is better. [:D] I enjoy them both a great deal regardless. As for your comments about John's 67 songs being better, again, a matter of choice--but misguided all the same. The Macca songs you mentioned are awesome, not to mention getting Better, Fool on the hill or Penny lane....I could go on forever....Macca blows his doors off again. And I have never cared what any the Stones, U2 or either of the copycat Macca-wanna-be Gallagher brothers say about the Beatles or Paul. [:D] Now---put that in your Pipe of Peace and take a nice long toke. Should we talk about their choice in women now? CHOKE!!!