Would Paul be great if wasn't a Beatle??

by **dsnito** » Wed Feb 12, 2003 5:27 pm

Well, I think this question sometimes came to almost everybody's mind but I ever wanted to know if our Macca would be that admired and loved artist IF(there I'm going again with IFS!!)he wasn't a former Beatle?? Or wouldn't be THE BEATLES that revolutionary group without Paul?? I DON'T KNOW!!! That's too hard to imagine!!! Well, thinking better... NO!!!Paul wouldn't be great without the Lads neither them without Paul!!![;)]Am I right or wrong??

Peace.

by **megs** » Wed Feb 12, 2003 7:30 pm

he probably would of never made it big if it wernt for the beatles[8)]

by **Brains** » Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:17 am

I think he needed John to make it really big. Maybe his own music doesn't stand out enough to be as big as he is now. I think his solo career was based mainly on the ex-beatle image, even though he tried not to.

I know for myself that I knew the Beatles first, and then got into Paul solo (I'm 20 years old, so I wasn't there). Is it the other way around for anyone? I can't imagine.

by **Brains** » Thu Feb 13, 2003 8:31 am

Of course he'd be great, probably not big.

by **dsnito** » Thu Feb 13, 2003 2:02 pm

Yes Brains, probably you're right... BIG, that's the word! Maybe he would be great indeed, but not that BIG. Thanks, man!!

Peace.

by **scrodfish256** » Thu Feb 13, 2003 8:55 pm

quote:he probably would of never made it big if it wernt for the beatles

It's so hard to say. He definitley would have had at least some success.

by **dakota** » Sat Feb 15, 2003 9:44 pm

Well, according to John, Paul was not strong enough, George was too shy and Ringo was the drummer. This might add some insight into wether Paul could of had a strong enough personality to make solo from the beginning. Or, consider that maybe Paul could of hooked-up with another band. After all, it appears that Paul has always enjoyed being in a group situation more often then being solo.

by **dsnito** » Mon Feb 17, 2003 3:30 pm

Yes, certainly Dakota, he lived his best days when was one of The Fabs if taking out the stressed last year(1969)...

Peace.

by **dsnito** » Mon Feb 17, 2003 3:36 pm

Hm, I was thinking another thing...IF(again!)he was one of the Rolling Stones... ah, no... it wouldn't work out...he and Mick together?? It wouldn't combine, no way!!Forget it!!

Peace.

by **Gastro (gone)** » Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:46 pm

It was fate and destiny that brought the Beatles together. If that had not happenned then we would never have heard of John, Paul, George or Ringo.

Like Brains said I got into the Beatles first and that's what got me intrigued into each member's solo endeavours.

Would Paul be great if wasn't a Beatle??

Would Paul be great if wasn't a Beatle??

Who is online