Rolling Stone mag gets it wrong

Discussions of various topics about Paul not covered in the forums below.

Moderator: Mike

Rolling Stone mag gets it wrong

Postby Jeremy K2 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:17 pm

Hi all

Yesterday I was browing through a Rolling Magazine special listing the all-time greatest 100 artists.
The Beatles came in as expected at number one, John came in at 38 (might of been 33 can't precisely remember which) but Paul didn't make the list as a solo artist at all!! :-x I couldn't believe this.
What do others think? Elvis Costello gave an introduction to the magazine release and I know he is a fan of Paul as well as a past collabortaotor. He came in around the 80's on the list.

How can this be?
P.S. Isn't this new album sounding exciting!! :-D
Jeremy K2
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 5:05 am
Location: Australia

Re: Rolling Stone mag gets it wrong

Postby efghijiloveyou » Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:57 pm

If that's accurate, I think it's absurd. This is, I guess what we should expect from a magazine that has taken to glorifying killers instead of using their heads.
User avatar
Silver member
Silver member
Posts: 1128
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:50 pm

Return to MACCA - all discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests