i'm thinking that there is absolutely no reason to believe that he will stop making albums in the vein of all the ones that have come before: for almost all of his career, most of his stuff, whether with the beatles or solo, is
not blasting vocals/beltin' out style...most is, and has always been, slightly rockin' m.o.r.-ish...and there is nothing i've seen or heard that makes me think he's done with all that or that he cannot handle that
live concerts might need a bit of a tweaking if this current problem is permanent...but as so many have mentioned, if he would just do a bit less, and do it more intimate, like the 'chaos' special...i'm thinking that we can all enjoy his artistry for some time to come, i bet.
as the big LB just mentioned : there is this thing called a studio...in which he can take his time, have many takes, if need be...and sing whatever he feels like singing...
there is no reason to assume that the only thing he has left in him is classical or jazz...
there is no reason to assume that whatever album he might be currently thinking about/is working on would/might/is the last...
there are a whole heck of alot of artists his age (or near), who are not putting out this much work, if at all...he is one of the few who not only is making new music, but making really good music...what in the world is possessing some to think that this is going to stop ?
because his voice got a little glitchy of late ?? that's it ?! game over...we're screwed ?!?
really ???!!
he's very obviously taking his time with each project for quite some time now...there's been years-long gaps from POP pretty much on...to make sure it is exactly what he wants it to be...
that is the sign of an artist that cares about his integrity and legacy...not necessarily a sign of one who is done for good, ready to throw in the towel
there is way too much gloom 'n doom about what could really be nothing at all

... sorry...end rant...
you wake up...sip hot tea...mindless music, radio free. see blue skies and think of sea...how are you doin'