by mr h atom » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:39 am
IF she were using the 'media' just and solely to attack the 'papparazi/media'... great; and i'd say more power to her...
but clearly, if you watched that interview, and it's follow up on americas NBC: she also used it to vaguely, amd more than nearly directly, attack paul: the accusations included vieled 'if they only knew the things i knew' sort, to virtually accusing him of taking out a hit on her...(WHO do you think she was refereing to?)
she did, with those two interviews, exactly what she insinuated paul was doing: dragging/slagging her soon to be ex-spouse thru the mud.
one shouldn't let ones prejudice against the media blind one to the abuse of the media exhibited in these so called interviews: they were tabloid recklessness at its worst.
you wake up...sip hot tea...mindless music, radio free. see blue skies and think of sea...how are you doin'