by ANGRY » Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:50 pm
no offense against our good friend jules, but, if the vibe i'm picking up from his overview is correct, i believe that i will love this Bond...
i have been very intrigued from the moment they cast Craig...it boded very well - the first thought was " maybe it'll be like Dalton ', but, i figured the producers would blow it (again)...Bond was always meant to be dangerous, and, for it's time, the initial Connery ones were, believe it or not, considered a little edgy.
the casting of Lazenby was, IMO, a darned good one, the first two Moores were respectable, but the rest began a slow slide into near farce..(i still enjoy them, tho..)
i couldn't even bring myself to check any of the Brosnan ones out, in the theater...they ALL became 'wait-for-video' moments, and only the last one had a really good feel, for me...and i like pierce brosnan as an actor, it was just too darn clear, considering the Broccolis invol...er, overinvolvement that they were angling back into the late roger moore style.
ennywayz...i am rather P.O.'d that i haven't had a chance to see it (it's one film i have been eager to see, the promos are wonderful !), but am happy to see that 007 still brings out a good crowd. my local theater is only showing it twice, and none have fit my schedule...but, soon...very soon