by mr h atom » Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:07 am
alot of people (including my dead twin...evil twit !) have been chanting the 'change-it-up' mantra for ...ooo...decades...
quite nice to see so many of you wake up and smell the starbucks about the variety (or, more realistically, lack of) on the set list: very nice to see the 'complainers' not being heckled to death, like in the very recent past...
i've argued before, one can't really carry the 'greatest-rock 'n roll- writer/artist, etc' mantel if one just keeps doing the same schtick...
i believe paul replays these songs solely because he knows it will appeal to the broadest range of fans and tag-a-longs...
but the set lists have never been catalogue challenging..
and therein lies the rub: most of the songs (and albums) left out are pretty dang good (if not great) ones,
it will take this artist to stand up for them and play them (as he has with others, recently): thumb the nose in the face of the non-believers, to get everyone to realize 'wanderlust/temporary sec./rocky raccoon/oh woman, oh why/jrs farm...etc,etc, take-yer-pick' will ALL sound great live
there are not, supposedly, many more tours left (that's the rumor, right?) so doesn't it make sense to go out artistically, with variety and flourish, as opposed to elvis-ing out ?
mccartneys musical legacy is one heck of alot larger than ' live and let die/band on the run/hey jude/jet/let it be: he ought o own up to it, let the captured audience know it...
having said that, the list is not awful ,and should appeal to a wide audience, indeed.
but...legacy wise...he's swimmimg in the same river as before
still...wouldn't it be nice to have one concert with little or no beatle music: just wings/solo paul stuff...and not all the stuff he's done a thousand million times...just one...
"i'd buy that for a $1!"
you wake up...sip hot tea...mindless music, radio free. see blue skies and think of sea...how are you doin'