I Don't Have To Do Anything That's Against My Kind-Hearted Non-Aggressive Nature... That's the Beauty of being Human, we do have a choice you know...Steve-o wrote:EDIT: Laz=King of Idiotic Replies. You can't stick to the issue. Personal/family safety and global issues are 2 different things, cone-head.Lazarus_2 wrote:The act of overblown defence shows the most fear of all.Steve-o wrote:Laz...are you ignoring the above question?Steve-o wrote:Sounds like you wouldn't want to defend yourself or your family, no matter the cost. Fear?
Threats on the phone, stalking, these things if the Authories are informed can be stopped.
I'm not gonna go-out and methodically seek-out those that threaten me.
I would defend to a "reasonable" extent.
Difference between you and me,
i find it "reasonable" to restrain the offender to appropriate degree, "hold him off" as it were.
You find it "reasonable" to invade another Country and destroy the offender.
EDIT: Or methodically "seek-out" the so-called "offender" even before they have done anything.... Out of "fear".
Would you do what you have to do while protecting your family if their life was in danger?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests