by jules » Sun Jun 24, 2007 8:01 pm
Some thoughts on Pepper, although I know they're not original thoughts! Pepper marked the time when The Beatles ceased being John's band and started to become Paul's band. (The late Ian McDonald makes this point at length in his book "Revolution In The Head")
It isn't that John wrote nothing of consequence before Pepper. Or that Paul wrote nothing great before Pepper. But Paul, from around this time, really was on fire, as John had been in '63/64/65. The gutsy, bluesy, guitary John songs of the A Hard Day's Night era had vanished and were replaced by Paul's eloquent, neo-classical, sometimes Brian Wilson-inspired and often piano-based songs.
The tide was turning in Paul's favour on Revolver. But on Pepper, I think Paul pipped John to the post. I started off, as a kid, loving the early Beatles John-dominated sound. I liked the more rock'n'roll sound. My favourite album s were A Hard Day's Night and Beatles For Sale. Both of these albums contain John's most evocative, driving, strong, gritty songs. I was totally put off Sgt.Pepper. I thought it was twee and lightweight and too music-hall/vaudeville.
Then, in my teen years I loved all of it - the whole of their output. But Pepper, I imagine, must have really divided people back in '67, which, unfortunately is before my time. It really does draw a line under what went before.