Quite an interesting read. The first real evidence of court documents. There is a great deal of personal information that is now public that concerns me, particularly Paul past, recent and current security arrangements.
http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/judgments_guidance/judgment_180308.pdfQuote from Paul - “I do believe that Heather’s misconduct since our separation, her concerted campaign to destroy my reputation through leaks, lies and breaches of confidentiality, should be taken into account by the Court to reduce the award she could otherwise have expected to receive. It will be for my legal representatives to explain this further.”
Judge hints to yet another trial ? "I regret to say that I strongly suspect that the motives of both wife and husband in trying to introduce the conduct of each other into these financial relief proceedings has got far more to do with the impending libel trials than the instant proceedings."
Judge to make an order that both parties ageed to - "to an order, subject to any leave to report being granted by the judge, prohibiting both the husband and herself and any persons acting on their behalf from publishing, disclosing, or in any way revealing without the consent of the other, the evidence, correspondence, transcripts or judgments in this case, the terms of the financial award and any marital confidences; and if consent was not forthcoming then the party seeking publication should be able to seek the permission of a Family Division Judge."
Judge's warning - "I should warn each of the parties that if either of them personally or through their associates transgresses, then the consequences for committing a contempt of court may be dire."