by Child Of Nature » Fri Mar 14, 2003 10:07 pm
Chris, i disagree with you..
One might as well dismiss "Imagine" as empty and frivilous.
I believe John Lennon's desire for peace was valid and just, and he had every right to interject his beliefs into his music.
Like it or not, John was pro peace,anti war, very liberal, pro socialism, and many conservatives are very uncomforatble with that, even today-. And rest assured, if he were still with us today, hed be marching in protest at the maddening war looming on the horizon.
Look back at the 60s- most music then was a reflection of what was happening in our society...
Folk music reflected frustration over an empty war in Vietnam, and that spilled over into mainstream pop and rock.....
Music of Mowtown, such as Marvin Gaye, spoke of the fight for civil rights....
Im amazed there are many folks these days who feel musicians should shut up about war or politics..yet they forget rock itself was about speaking out about what was happening around us...
Be it 'Imagine', or 'Luck of the Irish', or 'Happy Christmas/War Is Over, John was indeed a voice for those who felt peace was prefereable to war.I have great respect for John..he cared about the world, and he made that known in his lyrics.
There are many conservatives today who dismiss John as a rabble rousing communist...
To me he was a beacon of hope,advocating peace, and certainly deserved the Nobel Peace prize....
Child Of Nature